Triangles background



CBRE Group, Inc. is the world’s largest commercial real estate services and investment firm, with 2020 revenues of $23.8 billion and more than 100,000 employees (excluding affiliate offices). CBRE has been included on the Fortune 500 since 2008, ranking #128 in 2020. It also has been voted the industry’s top brand by the Lipsey Company for 20 consecutive years, and has been named one of Fortune’s “Most Admired Companies” for nine years in a row, including being ranked number one in the real estate sector in 2021, for the third consecutive year. Its shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CBRE.”

CBRE offers a broad range of integrated services, including facilities, transaction and project management; property management; investment management; appraisal and valuation; property leasing; strategic consulting; property sales; mortgage services and development services.


CBRE Global Investors, combined with CBRE Clarion Securities and CBRE Caledon, is one of the world’s leading real asset investment managers with $122.7 billion in assets under management.

Built up over more than 40 years, our unparalleled platform is focused on real assets, giving our institutional clients access to real estate and infrastructure in the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific. Our clients benefit from a complete range of investment solutions including equity and debt, direct and indirect, and listed and unlisted strategies.

Trammell Crow Company, founded in Dallas, Texas in 1948, is one of the nation’s oldest and most prolific developers of, and investors in, commercial real estate.The CBRE Global Investors and Trammell Crow Company platforms make up the Real Estate Investments division of CBRE Group.

The Real Estate Investments division is led by
Mike Lafitte, Global CEO, Real Estate Investments.


Regularly released content on the state of the real estate and infrastructure industry are produced by our subject matter experts and shared on their blogs. A selection of them can be found below.

Triangles background
Expert View: Global Investment Partners


Ian Gleeson

Chief Investment Officer - Global Real Estate Strategies (Direct & Indirect)

Achal Gandhi

Chief Investment Officer – Global Indirect Real Estate Strategies

Views 2488 times

Increasing exposure to global real estate presents a compelling opportunity for LGPS funds

Click here to read the full paper including graphs: LGC article – Ian Gleeson and Achal Gandhi

Over the past 20 years, real estate has become an established global asset class for institutional investors, in common with equities and bonds. While UK pension funds have maintained a home bias with respect to real estate, the allocations to global real estate have been steadily increasing.

Our experience has been that investors, recognising the benefits of global real estate, have opted for 25-50% of their total real estate allocation to be directed internationally.

This contrasts with data from the Local Government Pension Scheme community, which shows that in aggregate, as at March 2018, global real estate represented less than 2% of total asset allocations (source: CBRE Global Investors analysis of individual LGPS fund reports 2018), whereas institutional investors around the world typically have allocated approximately 7% to global real estate (source: INREV).

We believe that increasing exposure to global real estate is a compelling opportunity for the LGPS, primarily due to the higher risk adjusted returns and diversification benefits that the sector affords – including protection against muted performance in domestic markets.

While the UK has a relatively large real estate investment market, it only represents about 5% of the global investable universe*. By broadening allocations to include markets outside the UK, investors can substantially increase their opportunity set.

The range of opportunities for investors is diverse across the three principal regions of continental Europe, the Americas and developed Asia Pacific.

Over the past five years (to the end of 2019) global real estate has performed favourably against UK property, and looking forward we expect this to continue given political and economic uncertainties. As such, a UK pension fund with an allocation to global real estate would have outperformed a UK pension fund with a sole domestic property portfolio. From purely an absolute returns context, the case for making an allocation to global real estate is compelling.

While an accretive return profile is important, investors have long been attracted to global real estate due to the diversification benefits that can be achieved. Income returns from property have proven to be relatively stable, however total returns display higher volatility. Real estate is a cyclical asset class; these cycles differ significantly from country to country because of their specific demand and supply drivers.

The upshot is that real estate markets are not perfectly correlated because of this local nature of the asset class. Therefore, having exposure to more countries and markets can create a more stable total return profile than investing solely in one country – a globally diversified real estate portfolio is likely to have a lower overall risk than a pure domestic portfolio.

A globally diversified portfolio is therefore somewhat insulated from local shocks or dislocation. This has been evidenced by the performance of the UK property market since the Brexit referendum result in 2016 when compared with the global property market returns over the same period. 

The cyclicality of real estate markets is reflected in the wide variations in returns across markets as illustrated in the graph. Dispersion between the strongest and weakest performing real estate market globally peaked in 2008 at 47.3%. The UK recorded a total return of -21.9% in that year. Being exposed solely to the domestic market in that year would have been extremely damaging to investment performance. In short, in our view this cyclicality creates an opportunity to earn excess returns – and greater downside protection – through top-down market selection by tactically tilting allocations towards markets that offer better return potential at each point in time. Top-down market allocations and investment selection both offer considerable opportunities to generate enhanced risk-adjusted returns.

For many investors, environmental, social and governance factors are high on the agenda, especially as it relates to real estate. Our experience from investing globally has been that in many markets energy efficiency measures and certifications are increasingly common place, and in some cases such as Australia, they are significantly ahead of the UK, thereby giving investors comfort over the sustainability of their real estate exposure globally.

In conclusion, there is a strong case that adding global real estate market exposure to a pure UK real estate portfolio should reduce overall portfolio risk. These attributes have made increasing global real estate exposure a key focus for a number of institutional investors and we expect this to continue into 2020 and onwards.